What counts as a response?
Only an explicit candidate-choice response with source, response provenance, deduplication, exclusion checks, and protocol review can enter the direct-response evidence lane.
Campaign methodology | WA-10 response status
This page explains how the Adam Arafat campaign captures explicit voter-choice responses and what the current evidence can—and cannot—support.
Only an explicit candidate-choice response with source, response provenance, deduplication, exclusion checks, and protocol review can enter the direct-response evidence lane.
The current lane is campaign phone-bank response capture. It is nonprobability evidence and should be read as an operational response snapshot, not as a representative survey of all WA-10 voters.
Percentages, margins, vote-share claims, and win probabilities remain unpublished until provenance, quality, weighting, nonresponse, and final publishability gates pass.
Read the separate campaign-authored Top Two outlook. It is a projection, not a poll result.
See the WA-10 Top-Two Primary explainer for ballot structure, advancement language, and official-result limits.
Social engagement, modeled scenarios, donor behavior, and viability signals remain separate context—not direct polling or secured votes.
Use the WA-10 Evidence Room for source-backed policy pages and the public polling change log for dated methodology updates.
No. The current response-capture lane is a nonprobability phone-bank frame.
Toplines require completed provenance, quality, weighting, and publishability review.
A future update will name the sample date, direct-response count, methodology, exclusions, and uncertainty limits before publishing any topline.